Posts Tagged ‘reduction’

Councils asked for big solutions by MfE

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010 by Admin
Kate Valley Landfill, North Canterbury

Kate Valley Landfill, North Canterbury

One of the big issues or themes during the WasteMinz conference was how councils and other Territorial Authorities are to use their share of the waste disposal levies collected by the Ministry for the Environment. The levies collected have been put into a new fund called the Waste Minimisation Fund. Half of the funds collected go to councils “on a per head of population basis” to help them with their waste mangement and minimisation plans (WMMP) and the other half to individuals, businesses and other organisations that have projects that meet the WMF criteria (some of the fund will also pay administration costs).

To date councils across New Zealand have received approx $3 million each quarter this year (with another about to paid). That’s a total of approx $12 million that, states Director of Operations for the Ministry for the Environment Martyn Pinkard, is to be used for solutions that are innovative, wide reaching within the community and have a direct impact on reducing the amount of waste that goes to landfill.

To July 2010 the district councils in Canterbury have received a total of $1.2 million with Christchurch City Council taking the largest share due to the largest population being in their jurisdiction ($815,000).

The Sustainable Initiatives Fund Trust can play a key role in helping local Canterbury territorial authorities to come up with and implement solutions that are both attractive and appropriate to the Ministry for the Environment and it’s aims in Waste Minimisation. Collaboration and industry and council integration will be vital in the success of projects that are to reduce waste to landfill and recover and use our resources more efficiently. Local solutions tailored to each community that have a long term effect will also be important.

Calling all Canterbury Territorial Authorities

Any district council in Canterbury that has a project or idea for a project that they could collaborate or co-fund with SIFT on can give us a call to discuss the possible solutions. If the project meets our criteria and the SIFT board give it the go ahead then our links, networks, ideas and possible funding could help to bring the project to fruition. Collaboration within the waste and sustainability fields are key to developing a sustainable future for Canterbury.

More information on payments to individual territorial authorities.

Downloadable maps of where the waste disposal sites are in New Zealand can be found here.

**Image by SIFT from WasteMinz Conference field trip 2009

Waste defined.

Friday, January 29th, 2010 by Admin

Let’s start from the beginning and look at what exactly is waste.

To start here is the definition of waste from the handy Wikipedia:

“Waste…is unwanted or unusable materials.”

And Dictionary.com (definitions that are relevant):

Verb (used with object)

1. To consume, spend, or employ uselessly or without adequate return; use to no avail or profit; squander: to waste money; to waste words.

2. To fail or neglect to use;

Verb (used without object)

1. To be consumed, spent, or employed uselessly or without giving full value or without being fully utilised or appreciated;

Noun

1. useless consumption or expenditure; use without adequate return; an act or instance of wasting.

2. neglect, instead of use;

3. anything unused, unproductive or not properly utilised;

4. anything left over or superfluous, an excess material or by-products, not of use for the work in hand;

5. remnants, as from the working of cotton, used for wiping machinery, absorbing oil etc.

6. garbage, refuse.

Adjective

1. not used or in use;

2. left over or superfluous;

3. having served or fulfilled a purpose; no longer in use.

4. obsolete; excessive, needless.

Wikipedia also has the following helpful definitions:

The Basel Convention: “Substances or objects which are disposed of or are intended to be disposed of or are required to be disposed of by the provisions of national law.”

The United Nations Statistics Division: “Wastes are materials that are not prime products (that is products produced for the market) for which the generator has no further use in terms of his/her own purposes of production, transformation or consumption, and of which he/she wants to dispose. Wastes may be generated during the extraction of raw materials, the processing of raw materials into intermediate and final products, the consumption of final products, and other human activities. Residuals recycled or reused at the place of generation are excluded.”

After looking at those definitions the best one is the wikipedia definition combined with the United Nations Stats Department definition. At any stage of a product’s (or service’s) life there will be waste, some part, process or ingredient that is not wanted or able to be used. When the raw ingredients are extracted or made there will be waste, when the product is designed there will be waste (paper, prototypes etc), when the product is manufactured there will be waste and then when the product is transported there will be waste, as it is consumed there will be waste (packaging, energy) and then when it is no longer able to be used or no longer wanted (as it isn’t trendy or technologically up to date) it will be wasted, thrown away.

Now, what we need to do is make the whole process more efficient to reduce the amount of waste at every single stage (either through product or system redesign, reduction or reuse) and make products that can be reused, repurposed or recycled then we will have a less waste going to local landfills or to other countries.

As always SIFT is keen to hear any ideas that you might have to help reduce waste to landfill.


Practical Action – Office Stationery Amnesty

Friday, December 11th, 2009 by Admin

Now is the perfect time to put the word out in your office for all unwanted and unused stationery to be brought back to the stationery cupboard. Imagine all those pens, pencils, notepads, paper clips and gluesticks floating about in desk drawers that aren’t being used. Once you have the stationery back you can work out what you no longer need to buy. This will save your organisation money and save resources used in making new stationery. And ulimately reduce the amount of waste from stationery because you didn’t need to buy more to add to the pile! Reduction in comsumption = reduction in waste.

Pen chandelier from ecofriend.org

Pen chandelier from ecofriend.org

NZ Behind in Social Lending says recent research

Friday, December 4th, 2009 by Admin
Glen Saunders (R) with Tindall Foundation's Trevor Gray (Foundations Manager) on the left

Glen Saunders (R) with Tindall Foundation's Trevor Gray (Foundations Manager) on the left

SIFT CEO Linda Norris travelled to Auckland on Wednesday to attend an insightful workshop on Social Lending. Presented by Glen Saunders the workshop was on his recently completed research into social lending in New Zealand that had been commissioned by the ASB Community Trust and the Tindall Foundation. Glen Saunders was the Managing Director of the European bank Triodos Bank and has experience in socially responsible investment and global investment markets.

The ASB Community Trust and the Tindall Foundation wanted to find out:

  • What trusts and foundations are doing overseas in social lending and investment?
  • What is happening in social lending in New Zealand.
  • And what are the prospects of increasing social lending in New Zealand.

Social lending is a type of investment that “sits between commercial loans and investment, on the one hand, and charitable grants and donations, on the other.” Social Lending has been used overseas for many years to help fund initiatives with a social goal but isn’t been utilised in New Zealand much at all. In fact, Glen’s reserach found that New Zealand isn’t keeping pace with “the international development of social enterprise and lending”.

As Glen Saunders states in the handout “Foundations should consider [social lending] for a number of reasons:

  • [That it will] increase their impact by extending their reach both in amount and type of project,
  • Allow successful projects to achieve greater scale,
  • Build stronger projects by improving a project’s management,
  • Provide better focus on long-term operational sustainability in projects,
  • Allow projects to acquire assets,
  • Avoid the weakening of a project through inappropriate grants,
  • Help build social markets, and
  • Allow systematic interventions where a mixture of loans and grants are needed.”

Along with diligent investment/lending practices and sound management of the project social lending will allow many with the ideas and projects to make them happen. If New Zealand is to become a more sustainable country reducing its waste to landfill and tackling climate change then individuals that have the solutions will need a hand to make them successful. Social lending will allow for public-private partnerships and the individuals and communities to lead the change required. All will benefit from this new way of investing.

Since the reserach has been collected SIFT has grown its loan portfolio in both number and size and we have made our first major investment in a project. SIFT is moving towards being the key social lender for waste reduction initiatives in Canterbury.

You can find more information here (a presentation by Glen Saunder’s to Philanthropy NZ in March 2009).